JTK wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This is why I compare Mozilla on Solaris against IE on
>> *Solaris*, where neither has a blatant advantage.
>
> Well, you mean where both have a blatant disadvantage, i.e., running on
> an OS which was never designed to support GUI apps. And again, which
> version of IE are you using? I don't think they've released a
> non-Windows version in rather a long while....
Both at an equal disadvantage means both on equal footing. The point was
to compare Mozilla and IE, not UNIX and Windows.
>> NT on a SPARCstation? You do know what a SPARC is, yes?
>
> Sure do. I thought MS for a while had a version of NT that ran on some
> of these 'also ran' Unix boxes....
I know they did NT for DEC Alpha (a friend of mine had an Alpha
workstation in his dorm room back in college that ran NT), but I think
that's basically it. Definitely none for SPARC.
>> There are a number of other browsers available for use,
>> and some of them are even Gecko-based, if that's so important, perhaps you
>> should use one of them. Instead, you choose to whine-post here until everyone
>> dismisses you as a troll and a cretin. THAT qualifies as having an axe to
>> grind.
>
> Meh, whatever.
The fact that there are Mozilla-based browsers that use native widgets
for UI, yet you continually complain that "Mozilla should use native
widgets for UI!" shows that you care more about annoying people than in
the actual project.
