jesus X wrote:
> Daniel Veditz wrote:
>
>>Marc Leger wrote:
>>
>>>>Wait until Netscape 6.5, Netscape 6 was based on an early Mozilla
>>>>release and had its problems. 6.5 will be a lot better.
>>>>
>>>Wait wait wait..that's all we've been doing. I wish Netscape would poop or
>>>get off the pot.
>>>
>>it has only been six months since 6.0 shipped, and a little less than 4
>>since 6.01
>>How long do you think an upgrade should take?
>>
>
> I remember back in the latter half of 1994, Cott Lang was updating Renegade BBS
> on a near weekly basis. One week there was 3 releases. If one man can update
> weekly, then a company the size of Netscape should be able to get out at LEAST 2
> updates per day. Sure, having 14 versions released per week might tangle
> administration a bit, but that's the price we pay for progress. ;)
>
> --
> jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
> email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
> web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
> tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
> warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
>
Updates on a more than daily basis... hmm... I wonder where one might
find something like that... *cough*MOZILLA*cough* ;-)
If Netscape wanted to, they could just brand every Mozilla nightly ever
made -- but I really doubt that doing so would win Netscape any new
supporters given the good today, bad tomorrow status of builds.
--
TommyBee
E-mail: http://www.tommybee.com/email.html
Web: http://www.tommybee.com/
