Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> I guess this was already discussed in bug 83401 but how would I know?
> That's another one of those bugs that non-netscape people can't see. This
> project would feel a lot more open with fewer of those. If there is a
> security issue and this patch is saving me from the perils thereof, I'd
> love to know about it. Somehow, though, this patch just seems like BS.
>
> -jwb
>
Try asking [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this, they should be able to make a
decision whether this bug should be Netscape confidential or not and
hopefully give you information about the general reasons for the bug
without revealing confidential info.
As for Netscape confidential, this category of bug should definitely not
exist anymore in bugzilla. Netscape have bugscape, that should be used
for all confidential bugs.
--
David Hallowell
UKUUG Linux 2001 Conference
http://www.ukuug.org/events/linux2001/
