And it came to pass that Bruce O'Neal wrote:
>I thought 6.1 was based on Mozilla .9?
>
>
Nope, .91
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
If you are sitting, just sit. If you are walking, just walk.
Above all, don't wobble.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
- Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozilla? Anonymous
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozill... Alex
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozill... Jason Bassford
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mo... Bren..
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mo... Fernando Cassia
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there'... Stuart Ballard
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mo... Bruce O'Neal
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there'... Christopher Jahn
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when th... Jay Garcia
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there'... Jason Bassford
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozill... Carlfish
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozill... John Dobbins
