Stuart Ballard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
RV wrote:
 ... an one more time Microsoft is caught with its pants down with their
latest FreeBSD (OPEN SOURCE) latest fiasco/embarrassment. I wonder about
how many lines of GPLed code might illegally reside in MS products as
well.. After all their EULA makes it illegal to disassemble/decompile
their code and theu refuse to show their code to others. Their
credibility when they deny it is close to zero. Follow the link to an
article in The Wall Street Journal:
http://public.wsj.com/news/hmc/sb992819157437237260.htm

Much as many people here might agree with you (myself included), this
isn't a forum about Microsoft. You didn't even bother to add the
slightest bit of a connection between this particular Microsoft action
and Mozilla.

Please leave such posts on alt.microsoft.sucks or SlashDot and leave
n.p.m.general for development of Mozilla. It's not like people here
don't read any other forums if they're interested in these issues.

Thank you.

Stuart.

PS Sorry to rant, but it gets on my nerves when people assume that just
because a project competes with Microsoft in some way, anything negative
about Microsoft is automatically on topic. If every possible negative
thing about Microsoft was posted in n.p.m.general, you'd have a hard
time finding the Mozilla articles ;)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]">

So you thought my original posting was just about MS bashing.  Follow the folllowing link to an article that proves my point. It specifically mentions Mozilla.

http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6352301.html?tag=tp_pr




Reply via email to