Mark wrote: > Holger Metzger wrote: > > >>Would you like to receive a snail >>mail letter written in different colors, different font sizes, different >>background pictures? >> > > > Well, not necessarily, but I *do* appreciate an occasional underline for > emphasis. :) Yes, I know we can do _this_ and *that*, but after all, > those only exist because there wasn't a way to represent them otherwise. > I *do* understand your point though, and largely agree. I guess that's why most Unix/Linux text-mode readers understand word formatting like *bold* /italic/, _underline_. Holger
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Gervase Markham
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Mark
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Justin H.
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Christopher Jahn
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Mark
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Holger Metzger
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Mark
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Jay Garcia
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Holger Metzger
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? A Martinez
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? te... Holger Metzger
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? te... JTK
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? te... Holger Metzger
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Henri Sivonen
- Re: SIG formatting . . html? text? Cevpx
