Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Justin H. wrote:
> >
> > As for why it shows correctly in a web page - you're explicitly defining
> > it as the image source. MIME type doesn't enter in at that point, as
> > you can use a cgi or other executable to draw a picture, or use other
> > sources in your IMG tag.
>
> Actually, it should matter. That's a bug.
I thought about this for a while after I read it. The first thing I
thought was "WHAT?!?!" Then I thought about it some more. A correctly
written cgi (or other server side script/process) would have sent a
"Content type:" header of image/jpeg. Once again, I put my brain into
hyper-drive without engaging a thought process first. ;-)
Thanks for the clarification!
Justin H.
--
Since when has deniability EVER been plausible?
