"Greg Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jon Hall wrote:
>
> > But as to the issue, sometimes image resizing in the html is very handy.
> > Look at it the other way, are we no longer going to be able to use the
> > height and width without making the image render badly? Might as well
> > get rid of them then...Is Mozilla trying to make the artists more money?
>
> I agree that scaling should provide a reasonable-looking image, scaling
> isn't the only (or even the main) reason to use width and height.
> Setting the width and heigh in the document allows the browser to
> correctly display the document before downloading the images.
If the height and width are the same in the HTML as they are in the
image itself, there is no problem. It only seems to be a problem with
scaling dithered images to odd sizes.
