"Peter Lairo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> > "Peter Lairo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> >>jesus X wrote:
> >>
> >>>>but might not post it in security (I too do not subscribe to
> >>>>n.p.m.security).
> >>>>
> >>>This is your shortcoming, not Gerv's.
> >>>
> >>No, unfortunately, it would be Mozilla's shortcoming.
> >
> > How is Gerv not subscribing to n.p.m.security a shortcoming
> > in Mozilla? There's nothing stopping him from subscribing
> > temporarily. I've done that myself when I had a question
> > that belonged in a group I don't regularly follow (like netlib
> > or ui).
>
> You misunderstood. The shortcomming is that nobody is (likely) posting
> this important question in n.p.m.security. And that is a shortcomming
> for Mozilla.
Nobody's stopping you from posting it there.
Go right ahead. Remember, Mozilla is a
*volunteer* effort.
