"Garth Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 9j77tn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9j77tn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "Daf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi- > > I recently downloaded and installed Mozilla 9.02 to use as a check for my > > webpages- I like to check my pages in all browsers. > > I am very new to Mozilla. > > Would someone look at this test page and tell me if they can see why > Mozilla > > is unhappy with this table? > > http://www.ktbb.com/bgtest6.html > > It works in all the other browsers (Opera, IE, and Netscape 4x and 6.01) > > I can't figure out what's up with Mozilla. > > Wel, it says it's XHTML Transitional 1.0, but it doesn't > validate as such. It also uses tables nested three deep, > and a "background" element on table cells (there is no > such attribute in XHTML 1.0) > > The W3C validator results (plus the source and the parse > tree): > <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ktbb.com%2Fbgtest6.html&; > doctype=Inline&ss=&sp=> > > I have to wonder why it uses nested tables so much...it > uses CSS for most of the styling, just not positioning. > > Truth is, Garth, I'm just not very good at web design yet. I have to use nested tables to get things where I want them. I'm just now getting to where I'm almost comfortable with using CSS for styling but haven't delved into the positioning part of it yet. I realize that it doesn't validate because of the background and height attributes and I thought I was just going to have to deal with it to get the design I want. But all that aside- I'm still wondering why Mozilla has the big hiccup over that table. Does it not like nesting? How is the CSS support with Mozilla? Anyway- thanks for the comments- I'll start looking into positioning with CSS Thanks -- Daffydd Morgan Tech/Sys Admin 903-593-2519 ext 209 www.ktbb.com www.kdok.com www.gleisercom.com
