And it came to pass that Dave Huang wrote: > In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri > Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>(XML is another story.) OTOH, increasing the stack limit to >>allow even more broken pages is most likely not worth the >>effort. Authors should just fix their HTML. > > They should, but like it or not, most people use IE as their > HTML validator-- Sloppy. They should use a validator, not a browser. -- }:-) Christopher Jahn {:-( Dionysian Reveler I like work; it fascinates me; I can sit and look at it for hours. To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Mark
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML David Gerard
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Jason Bassford
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Henri Sivonen
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Dave Huang
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML David Gerard
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Matthew Cruickshank
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Dave Huang
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Matthew Cruickshank
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Jason Bassford
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML David Gerard
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Chuck Simmons
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Matthew Cruickshank
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Scott I. Remick
