RV wrote:
010801c120e1$d22bc9a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Yes, nothjing wrong with accepting that using normalized data, the two browsers operate at the same level for the functions described. I also implied that without raw data to examine, normalized data that shows one of the browser to be 1/2 of the other perfomancewise is misleading. I read somewhere before that IE6beta was significantly slower than 5.5 in many areas. I would like to see data on that regard but I can't find the original URL. Anyone?When reading benchmark tests like the ones
done by CNet, we have to be careful at looking
at the number since they don't provide raw data.<snip>
Wait a minute though, you "accepted" the numbers they got with
Win2K and the high-end machine. ;-)
