"Jim Sculley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jason Kratz wrote:
> > "D'Arcy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> >
> >>I'd say it is pretty clear that Sun had nothing to worry about JDKs
> >>"criticalness" of Java. Anyone whith a bit of sense would know that
> >>JTK hadn't done even the smallest amount of research possible
> >>to arraive at an informed opinion.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > One has to wonder then why people still reply to his postings here....
>
> Because he has a habit of responding to genuine questions by uninformed
> posters. These responses generally include a stream of lies. If no one
> responds, the original poster is misled, and the steaming pile of lies
> ends up stored eternally at Google, with nothing to refute it.
>
Sure Jim but what about the rest of the postings? ;)
