>>it is identical to the mail6 keyword! > Let's analyze this. > > You say they're identical, if so, then why duplicate it? We don't need your > keyword then. You neglected to quote me correctly annd mention that I had also (repeatedly) said the the mail6 should be morphed to include ALL components (not just mail)! > You say they're identical, but who would make a keyword like "mail6" mean that > the marked bug is a low risk/high reward bug? Where's the logic? Ask the people who created the mail6 keyword if you want to know "who". > They're NOT identical. Using my secret decoder ring, I can tell you that the > mail6 keyword is for NS people to track bugs for Netscape 6.x's mail news > component. If it's useful to NS, it could also be useful to Mozilla. > Lastly, you never replied to my statement that low risk/high reward is > subjective, thus not easily able to be boiled down to a flag or keyword. Who said it would be easy? Many keywords are "subjective" - nsCatFood anyone? -- Regards, Peter Lairo
