You didn't spend much time looking at the code. hmm..
Did you happen to notice if perhaps the PL_strcpy function was enhanced
in some way that the standard function is not?
JTK wrote:
> I just CVS'd the code last night (MAN that's a lot of code). I wasn't
> able to spend much time looking at it, but let me ask one question:
>
> I did *NOT* see a 'roll-yer-own' STRCPY(), DID I?!?!??! YOU'RE WORRIED
> ABOUT RUNNING ON SYSTEMS WITH A BROKEN ***STRCPY***?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!?!?
>
> Holy Christ this thing's WAY more broken than I ever imagined.
>
>
