JTK wrote:
> Um, ok, since Cygwin (which is also required and rightly so) has fully
> functional GNU make, ash and bash, and uname, why is this stuff still
> necessary? Or is it leftover crud that never got removed?

Well, I believe the answer is here:
> "Netscape has internally modified versions of gmake, shmsdos, and uname that
> we use to get around some problems we were having keeping in sync with the
> Unix version of gmake"

--
jesus X  [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
 email   [ jesusx @ who.net ]
 web     [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
 tag     [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
 warning [  War doesn't determine who is right, war determines who is left. ]

Reply via email to