Mike Lee wrote:
> I don't see the signifcant of GPL everything. Only advantage is people
> can link mozilla to GPL program, but MPL will still be what mozilla is
> distributed as, with GPL as alternative license. Since GPL will
> essentually prevent third-party proprietary plugins.
This is not correct. A dual license is disjunctive - you choose which
license you'd like to work with the code under. So dual-licensing with
the GPL does not prevent people using it under the MPL and adding
proprietary files.
Gerv
