On 21 Sep 2001 08:47:32 GMT esteemed David Gerard did hold forth thusly: > Definitely. Its main problem is that its arse is incredibly fat - takes a > bucket of memory and CPU, and leaks memory horribly (much less than > previously, though). Nevertheless, it's my primary browser. I agree about the memory leakage. However, I am running IE 5.5 SP2 as well and if I leave it running for a day or two and visit many sites then when I go to shut down all its windows then when just one window is left it is frequently over 50 megs. So it leaks quite a bit as well. Though I think Moz is still worse.
- is mozilla stable? Jonathan Wilson
- Re: is mozilla stable? Martin Poirier
- Re: is mozilla stable? Mike Koenecke
- Re: is mozilla stable? KH
- Re: is mozilla stable? Bob Davis
- Re: is mozilla stable? Bob Davis
- Re: is mozilla stable? Emlyn
- Re: is mozilla stable? David Gerard
- Re: is mozilla stable? Randall Parker
- Re: is mozilla stable? Erik Harris
- Re: is mozilla stable? Jay Garcia
- Re: is mozilla stable? Erik Harris
- Re: is mozilla stable? Justin H.
- Re: is mozilla stable? Christopher Jahn
- Re: is mozilla stable? Erik Harris
- Re: is mozilla stable? Henri Sivonen
- Re: is mozilla stable? Christopher Jahn
- Re: is mozilla stable? Erik Harris
- Re: is mozilla stable? Brian S. Craigie
