Christopher Jahn wrote:
> 
> And it came to pass that Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Christopher Jahn wrote:
> >>
> >> And it came to pass that Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> >>
> >> > Garth Wallace wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Christopher Jahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> >> > And it came to pass that Mama Cass wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard
> >> >> > > Esben Mose Hansen say these wise words:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >>:-D Can you name one piece of software that does not
> >> >> > >>:fullfill all those three? vi, maybe ;-)
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Photoshop fufills all the above criteria.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Not hardly.  It only will undo one level, and it locks
> >> >> > up on me at least once a session.
> >> >>
> >> >> Photoshop undoes more than one level, but you
> >> >> have to use "Go Back One Step" (or whatever it's
> >> >> called) instead of Undo. However, I have had it crash
> >> >> every once in a while.
> >> > Photoshop is Like Unix, in that It needs all the System
> >> > RAM you can Give it.
> >> >
> >> > Put at least 1 gb of Memory in you PC and that will stop
> >> > Crashing. Why?
> >> >
> >> > because it keeps a copy of each change in memory or on
> >> > Scratch disk. If you have 20 illerations of a 5 mb file.
> >> > It might run out of RAM. I Have PhotoShopLe (can't afford
> >> > $600.00 for the full version. Since putting in 1.5 GB
> >> > system RAM and increasing the RAM Allocation for
> >> > PhotoshopLE it has not crashed once and works much
> >> > faster.
> >>
> >> That's pretty much what I though was happening.
> >> I'd rather use a program that works properly than
> >> compensate for poor coding with a hardware solution.
> >>
> >> And as I've also said, I don't care for the interface.  On
> >> the whole, it's not very intuitive or user friendly.
> >
> >
> ><grin> Maybe you need to try the Mac version. Those PC's
> >versions are
> > rather foriegn looking anyway! <Grin>
> >
> 
> Mac is the most non-user friendly thing of all.  I have no
> patience for them.
> 
> --
> }:-)       Christopher Jahn
> {:-(         Dionysian Reveler
> 
> Wake up, the whole world's gone...
> 
> To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom

How is that? I mean, you can take any program, even one as compliated a
Photoshop, or MacroMedia Flash and open the various menus to see what
they do and you can create something within 5 to 10 minutes. In Windows
and DOS you have to read the Manual cover to cover at least three times
before you can do anything. 

Word 6.0.1a for Mac was a Carbon Copy of PC interface down every icon.
It took me 6 months to learn every little Command. Once learned it was a
decent program. Recently I had to upgrade to Office2001 for Mac. THey
decided to go with a MacLike interface for the Mac product. I had it
down pat within a couple of days (took that long to find all the
different operations).
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET      |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street         |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(note: America web page is a link to another website may go away at
anytime! please visit any or all)

http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm
http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm

Reply via email to