Al Rider wrote: > You're a bit of smart ass, aren't you. You know perfectly well I just > inadvertantly keyed in IE when I meant OE. > > As to Linux and Apple, etc: I don't know the current stats for Win32 users; > but would guess it's about 90%. > > I don't like it; but that's reality. > > Seems to me it would better to provide a spellchecker for 90% of the users > rather than none. > > Many folks don't use Mozilla's really nice e-mail composer for their > regular work because they respect their readers and insist on sending > correctly spelled messages. > > Al........ > > DeMoN LaG wrote: > > >>Al Rider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01 Oct 2001: >> >> >>>IE6 [and IE5x] use the spellchecker provided by MS with several of >>>their applications. >>> >>IE6 does not have or use a spell checker. OE6 does. They are, for the >>most part, separate programs. >> >> >>>For those who don't have one of the MS applications, you can buy a >>>3d party spellchecker, for $15/$20, that simply provides the hooks >>>to the MS spellchecker files. The two I looked at changed the >>>names of the dll files so it appears they were providing their own >>>SW. >>> >>>In fact for Windows OSs, I wonder if MOZ could use the MS >>>spellchecker dlls with the proper wraper. >>> >>> >>Which means only Windows gets a spell checker, as last I looked people >>with Linux don't have Microsoft spell checker .dll's. >> >>-- >>ICQ: N/A (temporarily) >>AIM: FlyersR1 9 >>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>_ = m >> >
Having to read this crap twice because some twit crossposted is a far lot worse than no spelcheker. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
