I didn't see anything on this elsewhere. Maybe someone could shed some light on this.
Why does the html below render the alignment of these three sets of tables differently? More importantly, though, is that it seems to me that _none_ of them would be what a designer would want to happen (which would be having 'table two' take up all the space that table one hasn't...on the same line...all within the browser window). Am I missing an obvious way to get the desired layout? Regardless, at least one of these layouts below seems like a bug, would y'all agree? dan. -- PGP key at http://www.longhands.org/drg-pgp.txt Key Id:0x507D93DF <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> <html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <table border="1" align="right"><tr><td>TABLE ONE</td></tr></table> <table border="2" width="100%"><tr><td align="right"> TABLE TWO</td></tr></table> <br><br><br><br><br> <table border="1" align="right"><tr><td>TABLE ONE</td></tr></table> <table border="2" width="100%" align="right"><tr><td align="right"> TABLE TWO</td></tr></table> <br><br><br><br><br> <table border="1" align="left"><tr><td>TABLE ONE</td></tr></table> <table border="2" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"> TABLE TWO</td></tr></table> <br><br><br><br><br> </body> </html>
