Robert Cooper wrote: > > Claus Riemann wrote: > > > > It's a fine overview... The problem is that there is no real alternative > > to Lotus Domino. But this is not your fault. :-) > > > > Anyway: Anyone knows a project aiming to solve this? (You have something like > > DB files on the server and defines your views on this.) Anyone knows what decision > > HP has taken on OpenMail? A long time ago they were thinking about makeing it > > OpenSource... > > > > --cla > > Unless there have been some underground developments, OpenMail is > toast. From their website: > > "HP will support our customers using versions 6.0 and 7.0 of the product > for the next > five years until March 31st 2006. The new 7.0 release further > strengthens > OpenMail's ability to support thousands of users per server and provide > rich > functionality when connected to the Outlook client. Support for OpenMail > 5.10 > continues until 31st October 2001." >[...]
Oops. I thought the last info is like this: http://www2.linuxjournal.com/articles/buzz/0046.html http://www.zdnet.com/sp/stories/news/0,4538,2693104,00.html http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/03/12/010312oppetreley.xml Maybe they are no longer in fear of Microsoft and will continue their work... >The question that keeps coming up at my office (IT support for a >non-profit hospital) is how to replace Microsoft Exchange's mail >functions with something cheaper. The main advantage of Exchange is >[...] This is one of the problems of the OpenSource community... There are not enough 'real world enterprise' solutions... But we are leaving the discussion of the original thread. :-) --cla
