DeMoN LaG wrote:
>The sad thing is this: >Mozilla is a completely beta program, with no guarentees what so ever >that it will work/work as intended. People will bitch for *months* on >end that they can't get something to work right (even when other people >have never had a problem). IE6 is a finished product. It's designed to >work with a good amount of reliability. It doesn't, it crashes, it >takes your OS with it sometimes, yet no one says "Forget this, I'm going >to Netscape 6", but twice a week in these newsgroups people say "Forget >this, I'm going back to IE." Why is it more excusable for a finished >product to be unstable but people complain that something unfinished >doesn't work right occasionally? > I totally agree. People are much harder on Mozilla when something doesn't go wrong, or it works differenly then IE/OE. Maybe there is a way we can just filter those messages from the newsgroups, so newbies don't get discouraged. :-) -- Orrin Edenfield - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.orrinrule.com
