Syd Logan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03 Nov 2001:
> Not knowing any better, my read of the whole thing is that they ran > 6.2 in order to generate the IE vs. 6.2 evaluation in which we > "tied" IE, but they did not produce an in-depth evaluation of 6.2 > to replace their earlier 6.1 in-depth evaluation (you'll notice > that the link at the bottom of the head to head comparison points > to a 6.1 evaluation). They felt there was little or no difference > in the two products, not enough to warrant writing a in-depth > analysis that says the same thing as they said for 6.1. The only thing I disagree with is their Installation section. Upgrading IE is like a 16 meg download. A complete clean install of Netscape 6.2 is like 10 megs. A COMPLETE INSTALL. IE has a huge advantage of being preloaded onto every Windows machine, and it's UPGRADE is bigger than Netscape's full install. How can IE win that event? -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
