Cricky wrote: > Thanks Ahmet, > > The two links I've had trouble with are > > http://www.thematriarchy.acguilds.com/index.html > http://www.rpghost.com/3eHall/ > > The first page has been done in FrontPage and seems to have lots of MS tags > although I'm not sure what effect these have in Mozilla, while the second > page > partially loads for me. I was wondering if it could be something to do with > my > settings and not actually Mozilla. > > Thanks, > > Chris... > > > "ahmetaa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >>Hello >>For understanding exactly you should give some example URL's. >>And, if there is a real problem -because of non standart code, or bad >>browser sniffing etc- yes you should report them. For that simply you >>can go http://bugzilla.mozilla.org >>to see already reported bugs about such issues , you may make a query >>in query page, by setting Program area as "Tech Evangelism" >> >>Ahmet >> >>Cricky wrote: >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I hope this is the right newsgroup to ask this. I've just downloaded >>>Mozilla and I've noticed a few sites which display properly in IE >>>seem to download only partially or not at all in Mozilla. Is this >>> > because > >>>they contain IE-specific code or is it something on the part of Mozilla >>> > ? > >>>Should things like this be reported somewhere or is that only for actual >>>bugs ? >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Chris... >>> >>> >>> >>> > >
Neither site validates: validator.w3.org The first one doesn't have a DOCTYPE at all, and the second one appears to use an incorrect DOCTYPE--since it uses frameset items it should have a frameset DOCTYPE. The problem is the web authoring tools these site designers used, which do not build standards-compliant pages. The Web Standards Project (www.webstandards.org) is currently nagging, I mean evanglising, makers of web authoring tools to build compliant pages.
