Lucas MacBride wrote: > > Chris Hoess wrote: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Garcia wrote: > > > >>4.78 does in fact support CSS and quite well unless it runs into > >>proprietary non-standard CSS. > >> > >> > > > > Huh? I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a web developer who agrees > > with that. IIRC, 4.x's CSS support is a hack that turns CSS into JSSS, > > which tends to mangle a lot of things. "Quite well" is not the phrase I'd > > use. > > > > > > Nav4 has very deficient CSS support...here's the full scoop: > > http://webreview.com/style/css1/charts/mastergrid.shtml
Never said CSS in Communicator was perfect, just said I never ran into a problem with it. You have to remember that when CSS was added to Communicator that it followed the specs in use at the time. And since Netscape has decided for a long time they were considering a total rewrite aka Netscape Communicator 5 or Netscape 5 they just elected to not add or improve any CSS features and just remove any bugs. Something that will happen to Netscape 6 when they get all major bugs out according to current standards. Then Moz may crank up again for a Total write for Netscape X or XX. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If it's "fixed", don't "break it"! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm
