tradervik wrote: > While perusing the fascinating bug tree rooted by the "Ship Mozilla 1.0" > bug (103705), > I noticed that the performance tracking bug (103712) refers to another > meta bug, > "Mozilla 1.0 performance tracking bug list" (71066), which seems to > contain all > the other "depends" bugs for 103712. So, it looks like it would make > things a bit > simpler to hang 71066 directly off of 103705. Just a thought.
Some of the bugs we use to track 1.0 are also used by other people for other purposes; this sort of thing is inevitable. We're trying to enhance the page to indicate the relationship more clearly. Gerv
