Jay Garcia wrote: > > Gervase Markham wrote: > > >> Isn't one of the 'goals' of mozilla to as fast (why not faster ??) as > >> navigator 4.7x ?? > > > > > > Given the vastly-higher level of functionality, it's unlikely that > > Mozilla will ever do much faster than 4.x. Although our page load times > > seem to have it beat. > > > > Gerv > > > > Faster simply because Moz doesn't choke on ill-mannered code as > Communicator does. > > -- > Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion > Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI > UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
off all the sites I've visited I've only had problems with two. one makes extensive use of Java. what happens is some of the boxes with text simply do not draw with Communicator. The other site is a site for investment. It simply takes about a half hour to the load. IE opens it fine. any other sites i have ever visited I've never hada problem with. I have had two others to simply kill communicator. But; they were suggested by a post on a newsgroup that suggested they too were having a problem as well. It was later found that the site had bad code no browser would read. so 4 out of say 1000 ain't bad. Communicator is just not as bad as its being made out to be. If netscape had ripped out the Java and created a java plugin that would use the Apple MRJ. Or Sun would have wrote one for Communicator. And theny improved CSS. we would have been a lot better off. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If it's "fixed", don't "break it"! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm
