DeMoN LaG wrote: > > Yes you are missing something. The site does not have valid HTML. > http://validator.w3.org > > It does not pass with any doctype I tried, from HTML 3.2 to XHTML 1.0, > which means the reason it is displayed incorrectly is that it is > designed incorrectly
There are several things that the validator complains about. I took a static copy of the HTML so that I could more easily manipulate it. The site is generated by Cocoon2, which inherantly does a few things that will cause the validator to complain. The problem was that I had a COLS attribute in a couple of the TABLE tags. I don't know when I got it in my head that that was a standard attribute... but aparently the Validator says it isn't. *shrug* Once I removed that, everything was displaying correctly. There are still a few other bugs, as far as the validator is concerned, but I will deal with those in time. At least the main problem is fixed. Thanks, -Alex
