It would be quite nice (REALLY nice) if Moz could apply a default XSL to XML files that do not supply one. That shouldn't be too hard.
Or is it that it would not be "propah"? Ranjit. Lincoln Ramsay wrote: > > Vincent Nicolas wrote: > > > I've got a xml file that can be seen with IE5, in a tree form. > > Mozilla renders only garbage... > > IE5 (on MacOS 9 at least) has a bug where it doesn't display properly formatted > XHTML 1.0 To get this behaviour on windows, you have to give the file a .xml > extension. > > I guess some people might consider this a useful feature, but it doesn't belong > in a Web Browser. > > To display XML in a Browser, you need to tell the browser how to display the > data (with some kind of stylesheet). > > -- > . \|/ > . (o o) > +----------------------------------------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--+ > | There is no emotion, there is peace. There is no ignorance, | > | there is knowledge. There is no passion, there is serenity. | > | There is no death, there is the force. -- Jedi Code | > +-------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Ranjit Mathew E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member (Technical Staff), Phone: +91-80-209 75 11/12/13 Torry Harris Business Solutions, Fax: +91-80-226 84 42 Bangalore, INDIA. http://www.torryharris.com/
