On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 14:16:35 +0100, Chocobo_greens wrote: > On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 07:18:35 -0500, yatsu wrote: > >> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 09:34:52 +0100, Adam Sj�gren wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 02:32:03 -0500, Chocobo greens wrote: >>> >>>> that is very easy for you to say, for some of us, the red star, like >>>> mozilla's is still a symbol of death and destruction >>> >>> Sure, sure, you're entitled to that opinion. But what do you propose >>> instead? >>> >>> Using enormous amounts of energy on ranting about what is, is far less >>> constructive, for you, than to use energy on proposing viable >>> alternatives. >>> >>> Come up with a set of graphics, that is *so much better* that >>> everybody can't help to be convinced that it's a good idea to use them >>> instead, then! >>> >>> Show us how much better you can make it, or how much better your ideas >>> are. >> >> >> Sadly, no (sucessful) action has ever been undertaken to get some of >> the suggested icons in mozilla. >> >> Lack of alternatives isn't the problem. >> >> - yatsu > > all i asked was that there be a alternavive version of mozilla without > the communist icons for those who wish not to have them.. or at least > the option of not having them .. is that too much to ask? becasue you > are forced to have the icons now. and IMHO that goes against the point > of mozilla .
Not really. If you wish to use mozilla so badly, then simply remove the icon. It's open source, so, with a put of effort i'm sure you could remove it. Another alternative is waiting for the next Netscape release. While some or many might be offended by this simple graphic, keep in mind that it is only that; a few colored pixels on a screen with no meaning intended. - yatsu
