Erik Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:48:09 +0100, Jonas J�rgensen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Mozilla is still beta, hence the "0" as major version number.
>>
>
> I've been involved with plenty of projects that went on for years with 0.x
> versions simply so the development team could use this excuse, without any
> real intention of ever getting to 1.0. That's a copout.
The thing is that it has taken a while to write all the stuff that is
needed. And to fix the bugs that pop up.
0.x isn't an excuse, it _is_ the beta. and 1.0 isn't too far off.
And I think mozilla 0.x is tons better than IE anyways.
used it since 0.6, and Netscape 4.x before that.
--
Morten Nilsen, aka Dr. P
4th Age webmaster & designer - www.4th-age.com
Webprogrammer for hire
:wq
