Cat wrote: > >Right, it is quite a bit better than Netscape 6.1. IE 3.0 was quite a > >bit better than Netscape 6.1, years ago. Communicator 4.7x is better > >than both of them, especially in the mail/news department. > >Browser-wise, IE6 beats the bejesus out of all of those combined. > 1.Can you stop pop-up windows in IE without disabling Javascript?
Yep. Proxomitron. > 2.Can you stop images not from the current domain? Yep. Proxomitron. > 3.Can you stop window maximize/minimize without disabling Javascript? Yep. Proxomitron. > 4.Do you have the source code to do with what you want? > I want to browse the web. I need no source code to do that, nor do I want any if the result is Mozilla. > Actually have a look at a few pages with IE 3 before you go comparing > Mozilla 0.9.7 with it. Did that quite a bit back in the day. > http://www.anybrowser.com/siteviewer.html > The above URL was cut and pasted from Mozilla 0.9.7. You have to set > the clip board to except things form Netscape etc. Maybe a security feature? > Probably should be enabled by default. Of cause I can get the source to > both and find out for certain. > > >However, none of this has anything to do with CVS. > If the product was utter shit I wouldn't bother to try and fix it up. It > actually has some quite good features now. The favicon.ico actually works > for my site better than for IE5/IE6. Probably because of the outrageous way it hits sites whether they say they have one or not. And still, nothing to do with CVS. CVS works great. Get it rigged up, let it suck down source overnight, and put your shoulder to it. May I suggest some dead-easy starters?: 1. %-complete indication in downloading dialog box window titles, so that when minimized one can tell what the heck they are. 2. A context menu for the email composer.
