DeMoN LaG wrote: > "petern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > a0lh0m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a0lh0m$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 29 Dec 2001: > > >>It is much faster in IE but the PNG-images doesn't work very well >>in IE :) >> >>I really hope the DHTML performance in Mozilla will be as good(or >>better) as in IE soon. >>Hopefully before 1.0 is released. >> > > I wish I could check how this is on a slower machine. I have three > machines here, a 1.0 ghz Athlon, a 1.31 ghz Duron, and a 950 mhz duron, > and all three do this fine with any timeout setting. Wish I still had > my old P2 hooked up for this > >
Cewl...sure looks hideous in IE5 (just had to say that...bwahaha) The timeout setting doesn't seem to make any perceptible difference on my Athlon 650.
