Jay Garcia wrote:

> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> 
> 
>><snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape/netscape6/windows>
>><snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape/netscape6/macintosh>
>><snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape/netscape6/unix>
>>
> 
> 
> Curious ...
> 
> 
> Dave posted the same URL's basically but didn't include them in < > like
> you did. Why do you do that? I've asked this same question many times
> with no satisfactory responses. I also note that you do not enclose the
> URL's in your sig with < > ... ???
> 
> I notice no ill effects in any posts with or without the < > ....
> 
> 

Well, in fact there is a recommendation from The Internet Society, 
dating back to ancient 1998, to do exactly this. Below is the Appendix E 
of RFC 2396, quoted in full.


Berners-Lee, et. al.        Standards Track                    [Page 33]

RFC 2396                   URI Generic Syntax                August 1998


E. Recommendations for Delimiting URI in Context

    URI are often transmitted through formats that do not provide a clear
    context for their interpretation.  For example, there are many
    occasions when URI are included in plain text; examples include text
    sent in electronic mail, USENET news messages, and, most importantly,
    printed on paper.  In such cases, it is important to be able to
    delimit the URI from the rest of the text, and in particular from
    punctuation marks that might be mistaken for part of the URI.

    In practice, URI are delimited in a variety of ways, but usually
    within double-quotes "http://test.com/";, angle brackets
    <http://test.com/>, or just using whitespace

                              http://test.com/

    These wrappers do not form part of the URI.

    In the case where a fragment identifier is associated with a URI
    reference, the fragment would be placed within the brackets as well
    (separated from the URI with a "#" character).

    In some cases, extra whitespace (spaces, linebreaks, tabs, etc.) may
    need to be added to break long URI across lines. The whitespace
    should be ignored when extracting the URI.

    No whitespace should be introduced after a hyphen ("-") character.
    Because some typesetters and printers may (erroneously) introduce a
    hyphen at the end of line when breaking a line, the interpreter of a
    URI containing a line break immediately after a hyphen should ignore
    all unescaped whitespace around the line break, and should be aware
    that the hyphen may or may not actually be part of the URI.

    Using <> angle brackets around each URI is especially recommended as
    a delimiting style for URI that contain whitespace.

    The prefix "URL:" (with or without a trailing space) was recommended
    as a way to used to help distinguish a URL from other bracketed
    designators, although this is not common in practice.

    For robustness, software that accepts user-typed URI should attempt
    to recognize and strip both delimiters and embedded whitespace.

    For example, the text:

       Yes, Jim, I found it under "http://www.w3.org/Addressing/";,
       but you can probably pick it up from <ftp://ds.internic.
       net/rfc/>.  Note the warning in <http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/
       ietf/uri/historical.html#WARNING>.

    contains the URI references

       http://www.w3.org/Addressing/
       ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/
       http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/uri/historical.html#WARNING

-- 
   /M.v.h. Lars A.  >>>*P*M*<<<

  Check the site at <http://members01.chello.se/peemm>


Reply via email to