JTK wrote: > You know what I much prefer? Something the latest IE6 does: Renders > the page to the best of its ability, and puts a little "!" in the > bottom-left corner saying "errors on page" or something like that for > the six or eight people who actually care. I ask you sir, who loses by > doing things that way?
Considering how badly IE renders standards-compliant CSS, XML, or anything else more complicated than HTML4 Transitional, I wouldn't trust any "error" indicator it might spit out. It's just as likely to indicate a deficiency in IE6 as "identifying" any error in the code.
