WDA wrote: > daa wrote: > >> WDA wrote: >> >> >>>There is some validity to the cache problem complaint. It seems, that >>>when Mozilla crashes, it takes the cache with it. This is not a >>>catastrophic problem, but an annoyance the web browser community would >>>love to live without. >>> >>>I have a lot of confidence in the Mozilla building team. I'm sure that >>>in due time, the problem will be resolved. >>> >>> >> >> well you are 1/2 right, mozilla _intentionally_ zaps the cache after a >> crash >> to try and prevent currupt cache from causing more crashes >> > Then I am going to assume that by the time we reach 1.0, and all crashes > are eliminated, that this intentional cache crash will be trashed.
I don't see how something that happens when Mozilla crashes will matter when all crashes are eliminated. ;-) -- /Jonas
