JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09 Jan 2002: > Well then that's something the websites are doing wrong (i.e. not > being available) that's breaking Mozilla. Same diff - Mozilla is > blameless in all of this. Isn't that the Mozilla "philosophy"? > That the web and users should bow to Mozilla's requirements, rather > than Mozilla dealing with the realities of the web and its users?
Actually, the problem here is with Mozilla. I know you may think everyone thinks Mozilla is perfect, but that's far from true. Not all of us share your "Mozilla is dog poo" view of things, but I think everyone has some ideas for improvement. I always thought this was the process: Open web site If there is a <link>'d icon in it, use it If there is no <link>'d icon, request /favicon.ico I would have assumed a failure to open a web site would result in no favicon being fetched, but it appears that was not the case and I am just trying to find out if that was a fluke or if Mozilla will routine make a request to a dead server for a favicon > Now go delete your cache file or I'll call you a bunch of > potty-mouth names. Number of entries: 79 Maximum storage size: 4194304 Bytes Storage in use: 1471260 Bytes Memory cache usage report: List Cache Entries Disk cache device Number of entries: 2310 Maximum storage size: 51200000 Bytes Storage in use: 45826560 Bytes Cache Directory: <removed for privacy> Hmm, almost 45 megs of cache and I've never seen an out of date page. Thta's odd, isn't it? -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
