S�ren Kuklau wrote: > Pigeon wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Have a brief search on the net about the support of JPEG push >> on mozilla... >>
[snip] > I've found a bug about it: > >http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=product&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=JPEG&field0-0-1=component&type0-0-1=substring&value0-0-1=JPEG&field0-0-2=short_desc&type0-0-2=substring&value0-0-2=JPEG&field0-0-3=status_whiteboard&type0-0-3=substring&value0-0-3=JPEG&field1-0-0=product&type1-0-0=substring&value1-0-0=Push&field1-0-1=component&type1-0-1=substring&value1-0-1=Push&field1-0-2=short_desc&type1-0-2=substring&value1-0-2=Push&field1-0-3=status_whiteboard&type1-0-3=substring&value1-0-3=Push > > > > So there seems to be _some_ kind of support for it - but I've never > really heard of JPEG Push. What is it? > Sounds like a great new way to pump ads at you. > -- > This post written in MozillaNews, to prove JTK that it indeed works - > a lot better (especially FASTER!) than Outlook Express ever did. Maybe so, maybe not. The question is, does it work better than NC4.7x does? The answer there is "no". This answer posted via Mozilla's newsreader, to prove to Mr. Kuklau that there's a long distance between "barely functional" and "working properly", and an even longer distance between "working properly" and "good enough to compete". But hey, we finally got a context menu after six years; another decade or so and we should be right back to where NC 4.7x is today!
