And it came to pass that Simon P. Lucy wrote:
> On 21/01/2002 at 19:13 JTK wrote:
><delenda est>
>>And the swastika? What about that? Would there be anything
>>wrong with replacing Mozilla's "obviously not at all commie"
>>star with an "obviously not at all Nazi" swastika? If so,
>>how so, thou hypocrite?
>
> Your ignorance appears to have no bounds. The swastika is a
> perfectly acceptable and ancient Hindu symbol, though its
> unlikely to occur to anyone as an icon for a web browser.
> Whereas the swastika has acquired connotations in the last
> 70 years that would override its use in any other context, a
> star is simply a star as the State of Texas would seem to
> suggest.
>
> You seem to think in very narrowly defined categories and
> when challenged you retreat to abuse and irrelevancy. You
> are, it is evident to all, simply a bully.
Or as they say in the Lone Star state: "He's all hat, and no
cowboy."
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
Well, Katrina likes it.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
