S�ren Kuklau wrote: >
> Apparently, you're missing that Mozilla is not an end-user browser. So > logically, market share of Mozilla itself is nice, but doesn't matter. > What does matter is market share of mozilla-based products like > K-Meleon, Galeon and Netscape. Not to jump into the fire, but I feel cold today..... I do not know how important most end users care about back-forward performance. Of course, some users are going to think it is important. If Mozilla has slow forward-back behavior and all the derivative browsers inherit this (they will as far as I can tell), then it could affect market share for those browsers. I am not telepathic, so I am not sure, but I believe "Nobody Special" was referring to mozilla in the "all browsers made from Mozilla technology" way. This is like saying "internet" and "Internet" in my book (one referring to a TCP/IP network and the other referring to the place we all surf). Mozilla means many things to many people. I do not agree that because back forward is not as fast as other browsers that no one will use it. I do daily and have no issues with it's back-forward speed (perhaps I am not hitting the bad pages for this behavior). Still we are seeing people post about it from time to time here.... -Tom
