alpha wrote:
> 0.9.7 was released on the day the roadmap did stat it was to be released.
Yes. That happens sometimes, but not always. Note that the roadmap tells
the "ideal release". By the ideal release, 0.9.8 is far (exactly a week)
behind.
> But 0.9.8 is far behind anyone know why. ?
There were several bups targeted at 0.9.8 which needed to be fixed. I
think we're ready now (two bugs weren't fixed yet but will probably just
be re-targeted at 0.9.9 as they aren't that critical).
> I have not had any mayor error using 0.9.7 the last 3-4 weeks so why is
> 0.9.8 see fare behind. ?
See above.
I don't think asa reads this group, but if he does, perhaps he can
explain it better than me. ;-)
--
Regards,
S�ren Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
