Bundy wrote: > > "JTK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Ortwin Gl�ck wrote: > > > WHOA there buddy. Now, Maozilla may be chock full 'o' bugs, but it's not > THAT > > bad. Now, I'm the first person to say where the lizard needs help, but in > the > > area of taking their time to do it right they have no problems. I got them > to > > fix the context menu, the cache bug, and they're on the way to producing > the > > best build yet (thanks to me) with 0.9.8. Two more months, and no more > commie > > graphics, and we'll have the best browser around. I'm going to have to > whip them > > into shape with mail/news, though. I don't say it too much for fear > they'll get > > lazy, but Mozilla really is the best browser to come along in a long time. > > > > Tell me one single area where Mozilla outperforms Opera and Explorer? Just > one please.
Amount of memory used. Mozilla uses WAY more than either of those! ;-)
