I think it has more to do with the speed of the computer. Six months ago, I tried Mozilla on my old computer(166MHz, 32MB ram), and it was unusable to the point where even if there was a 100% performance improvement since then I think it would still be unusably slow(though I haven't tried it). Then I got a new computer(1.2GHz[Athlon], 384MB ram), and I really can't imagine a noticeable performance improvement to be possible for my browsing style...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have read/heard amny comments as to Mozilla's performance. Many people > claim Mozilla is very slow. I know that DHTML is slow, but other than > that I find Mozilla reasonably fast. But then I am connected to the > internet by a broadband cable connection. > > My question is this: Does Mozilla have a much poorer level of > performance on a dialup connection when compared to other browser (also > using dialup)? Is this why people say Mozilla is slow because of how > poorly it handles a dialup connection? Is it that Mozilla is better at > handling a broadband (vs dialup) connection when it is compare to other > browsers (using broadband)? > > I don't find Mozilla to be as slow as some claim it is. Is this because > the majority of people who claim Mozilla is slower than other browsers > are on a dialup? >
