DeMoN LaG wrote: > > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], > on 04 Feb 2002: > > >> Say, is there any reason that you mention the 0.75% (that are > >> probably not even true) in each and every of your posts? > >> > > > > It is true, and I mention it often to try to knock you guys back > > down to earth: Mozilla has no market share, and actually negative > > "mind" share - it's the laughingstock of the computing world, an > > image helped tremendously by the Netscape 6.0 freakshow. You got a > > tough row to hoe, and crying about poorly-written websites and > > deluding yourself into thinking people will tolerate something > > sub-IE and sub-NC4.7x just because it has a commie star on it and > > "isn't M$" is nothing but a self-defeating fantasy. > > Actually it's a complete lie by JTK. He quoted a website that showed > Mozilla had .75% market share. Last I checked, that same site shows > 3.0% market share.
Check with "TheCounter.com". If you dare. > JTK just refuses to acknowledge that Mozilla and > it's derivitives are actually gaining market share. Indeed I do, because indeed they aren't. > Get with the > program JTK. Are you going to cling to this .75% like you cling to the > "Hyatt said Mozilla is 4 times slower than IE" thing? > Well, I have to admit the number is actually closer to 0.7_3_%. Oops.
