Ian Davey wrote: > JTK wrote: > >>> Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a >>> 486 environment with 4megs yet Win 95 replaced it despite the fact it >>> required a Pentium class CPU and at least 16 megs of RAM. >>> >> >> Win95 was a hell of a lot better than Win3.11. Mozilla is a hell of a >> lot *worse* than NC4.7x and IE. >> > Trolling again? There's no way its worse than NC4.7, and it's nicer than > any version of IE I've ever used. You might find a few specific areas > where one of those two are better, but overall Mozilla is vastly > superior to Netscape 4 and better than IE in just about every area > except DOM performance. > > So what in your opinion makes IE so wonderful? So wonderful in fact that > you spend a huge amount of your time in the Mozilla groups. If it was > really so excellent you wouldn't be remotely interested in Mozilla as > you'd have no need for any other browser. > > I'm beginning to think that your relationship with Mozilla is similar to > that between those married couples who do nothing but argue and nit pick > each other, but love every minute of it. Except in this case the > relationship is one way... you're the Log Lady and Mozilla is the log. > > ian. >
Wordstar. Now isn't that ancient. At the time, the computers and hardware were junk and the specs were terrible. However, I must admit that Micro$haft's Windows 95(the reboot king)really zooms when it come to Windows. Mozilla zooms!! Romanator Don't Get Mad Get Linux
