"Pratik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On 03/07/2002 11:09 AM, alpha wrote: > > In article <a65vbl$1je1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > > > >>Just wondering what people on this forum think about Mozilla's usability in > >>a business environment. > >> > >>I have no doubts that the browser, even in it's current form can be > >>deployed. My concern however is the Mail application. > >> > >>Has anyone deployed Mozilla on a large scale? What shortcomings did yoor > >>users encounter most often? Do you think Mozilla 1.0 will have these fixed? > > > > > > If you use it on a corporate site that uses plain html and not alot of MS > > plugins then I think you should be ok. > > > > I have been using Moz 0.9.8 on many diffrent corporate sites but can get > > into problems when I get to sites that is used/made for IE as they stick > > stuff that IE will only understand. > > I think he was talking about deploying it in a corporate environment > i.e. all employees having to use to use Mozilla for their mail/news, > etc. Someone from AOL should probably answer. I read somewhere that > AOLTW switched to NS6.2 enterprise. > > Pratik. >
Can you show the article please? AOL-Time Warner is not interested in switching any of it's customers over to the Gecko platform although they might use a little bit of it with their Compuserve customers. AOL-Time Warner has no intention of accepting Mozilla/Netscape as a default platform. AOL-Time Warner could today, distribute Netscape as an option on every single cd they put out for free (I got about two dozen of the free AOL's cd's laying around). They don't. --Kyle Netscape's #1 critic The linux platforms are probably the only ones that Mozilla will ever penetrate on a serious level. Linux users and Mozilla developers have the one magic thing in common. Hatred for Microsoft.
