David Grant wrote: > It was also on the Register, which I think is a pretty reputable source. > > Netscape Basher wrote: > >> Thomas typed: >> >>> Sounds too good to be true. I would like to see an official statement >>> from aol. Or can you confirm this as a fact? :) >>> >>> Blake Ross wrote: >>> >>>> "A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies >>>> that assume their Web sites only need to work with Explorer >>>> scrambling to rewrite their code so that they don't lose AOL's 30 >>>> million-plus subscribers, or about 30% of all U.S. Internet users. " >>>> >>>> -- http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/03/08/1957252&mode=thread >>>> >>> >> >> If it were fact, all the top tech news (ZDNET, CNET, etc) >> organizations would be bloating about it. Considering this site is >> mostly about linux, you can dismiss the story as bogus until more >> evidence appears. >> >> -- >> Kyle >> >
Kyle, the register is usually the ones digging up the dirt so this stuff gets out to the big news sites.. They are not wrong on many stuff, but I agree they are on a lot of stuff too.. they are about 50/50.. -dman84
