On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 06:11:53 -0800, dman84 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:good.
>
>I also agree with that.. I've seem them really mess up new
>product/technologies and code-name announcements and have real bad miss
>understanding and it shows.. The journalist dont know squat about the PC
>technologies.. yet they write articles on them, and 9 times out 10 they
>end up screwing up telling poor users inacurate info.. which is why you
>have to rely on many tech-sites to be in the know..
>
Those self proclaimed professional tech news sites and magazines,
usually are the greatest pile of dung of earth, unbiased reviews
against a bigger advertiser, no way, in depth knowlede of the
technology no way, in depth knowledge about professional issues no
way. Giving the reader serious reliable info, no way.
I�d rather trust /. with their obious bias for Linux than any of those
ZDNET, CNET or Winmag or whatever.
