jukola wrote: > Patrick Gallagher wrote: > >> jukola wrote: >> >>> Christian Biesinger wrote: >>> >>>> ado beith wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as >>>>> soon as I load the browser up >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Did you get a "Talkback Window", asking you to send in crash >>>> information? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Why would anyone send in "Talkback Information"? >>> >>> This "talkback" does not only send the information about what >>> happened just before the crash but also detailed information about >>> your computer and what's connected to it. >>> >>> Even if you unclick the unneccesary parts of the "talkback" >>> information this "customised" version of "talkback" is not stored but >>> you have to do it each and every time you send "talkback" >>> information. "Talkback" is talking back.... >>> >>> I have abolished "talkback" long ago. It's a "NO" each and every time >>> a crash has happened and the question whether or not to send a >>> "talkback" is presented. >>> >> IF you're not willing to offer information about crashes to help build >> moz into a great and stable platform, why would you run it? The main >> purpose of using moz is (supposed to be) testing, and providing >> feedback that can assist in the development process - this is why the >> binaries are provided int he first place, isn't it? >> > > I'm more than willing to offer information about crashes contributed to > Mozilla. > > I'm though not willing to give away detailed information about my > present computer; type of processor, speed, the software I'm using, what > printer I have etc. and so on. This has nothing to do with the behaviour > of Mozilla during crashes. Mozilla is a software, "talkback" should not > be concerned about what printer I'm using, only of it's own drawbacks. >
Then why install a talkback enabled build? I thought the difference between "mozilla-win32.zip" and "mozilla-win32-talkback.zip" was that one was talkback enabled while the other wasn't. Of course, just because I *think* it doesn't make it true... Regards, Tim
